The only purpose of another public hearing would be a political spectacle in which Democrats could wax indignant for the cameras while Mr. Kavanaugh repeated his denials.
The only purpose of another public hearing would be a political spectacle in which Democrats could wax indignant for the cameras while Mr. Kavanaugh repeated his denials. The timing and details of how Ms. Ford came forward, and how her name was coaxed into public view, should also raise red flags about the partisan motives at play.
The Post says Ms. Ford contacted the paper via a tip line in July but wanted to remain anonymous. She then brought her story to a Democratic official while still hoping to stay anonymous. Yet she also then retained a lawyer, Debra Katz, who has a history of Democratic activism and spoke in public defense of Bill Clinton against the accusations by Paula Jones.
Ford to take a polygraph test. The Post says she passed the polygraph, though a polygraph merely shows that she believes the story she is telling. The more relevant question is why go to such lengths if Ms.
Ford really wanted her name to stay a secret? Even this weekend she could have chosen to remain anonymous. These are the actions of someone who was prepared to go public from the beginning if she had to.
The role of Senator Dianne Feinstein is also highly irregular and transparently political. The ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee knew about Ms. If she took it seriously, she had multiple opportunities to ask Judge Kavanaugh or have committee staff interview the principals.
But in that event, the details would have been vetted and Senators would have had time to assess their credibility. Her statement was a political stunt.
She was seeking to insulate herself from liberal charges that she sat on the letter.
Or—and this seems increasingly likely given the course of events—Senator Feinstein was holding the story to spring at the last minute in the hope that events would play out as they have.
Surely she knew that once word of the accusation was public, the press would pursue the story and Ms. Ford would be identified by name one way or another.
Democrats waited until Ms. Ford went public to make public statements. But clearly some were feeding the names of Ms. Ford and her lawyer to the press, and now they are piling on what they hope will be an election-eve MeToo conflagration.
That cannot happen in this case. GOP Senators should understand that the political cost of defeating Mr. Kavanaugh will likely include the loss of the Senate.Definition of The Wall Street Journal: International newspaper with a strong focus on investing and corporate news.
This publication is distributed to consumers through . Aug 17, · Although social purpose activities can entail significant costs and effort, if successful, they can strategically position a company more effectively in the eyes of a wide variety of constituencies. These activities can also create business value on six key dimensions, including risk mitigation, operational efficiency, brand differentiation, and talent engagement.
Today’s Wall Street Journal has published an editorial on the Kavanaugh ambush. I detect Kim Strassel’s hand in the editorial.
I detect Kim Strassel’s hand in the editorial. Tesla Inc. Stock - TSLA news, historical stock charts, analyst ratings, financials, and today’s Tesla Inc.
stock price. The CEO’s letter arguing for sustainable investing ignited a burning debate about his concept and himself. The Wall Street Journal. Personal Finance Workbook [Jeff D. Opdyke] on timberdesignmag.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
A hands-on, interactive guide to managing your monday and building your financial future Many of the worksheets in this book are available online and can be saved.