The Nature of Friendship Friendship essentially involves a distinctive kind of concern for your friend, a concern which might reasonably be understood as a kind of love. Philosophers from the ancient Greeks on have traditionally distinguished three notions that can properly be called love: Agape is a kind of love that does not respond to the antecedent value of its object but instead is thought to create value in the beloved; it has come through the Christian tradition to mean the sort of love God has for us persons as well as, by extension, our love for God and our love for humankind in general. Given this classification of kinds of love, philia seems to be that which is most clearly relevant to friendship though just what philia amounts to needs to be clarified in more detail.
What Is the Internet Doing to Relationships? Does the internet degrade friendship, kinship, civic involvement, and social capital? One of the great debates about the internet is what it is doing to the relationships that Americans have with friends, relatives, neighbors, and workmates.
Back in the early years of the internet, some prophets felt that the internet would create a global village, transcending the boundaries of time and space.
With the development of the internet…we are in the middle of the most transforming technological event since the capture of fire. I used to think that it was just the biggest thing since Gutenberg, but now I think you have to go back farther p.
Rapidly… [w]e are now creating a space in which the people of the planet can have that kind of communication relationship.
This approach ignores the positive benefits of being involved with the internet: A more pervasive concern has been that the internet sucks people away from in-person contact, fostering alienation and real-world disconnection.
For example, Texas broadcaster Jim Hightower worried that: The media paid much less attention to the follow-up report that found much of the stress does not continue as people become used to the internet.
As a result, Americans may be sitting at their computer screens at home and not going out to talk to our neighbors across the street or visiting relatives.
There are worries that relationships that exist in text — or even screen-to-screen on flickering webcams — are less satisfying than those in which people can really see, hear, smell, and touch each other. The debate about the impact of the internet on social relations is important for four reasons: There is the direct question of whether relationships continue to flourish in the internet age.
Are there the same kinds of ties — in both quantity and quality — that flourished in pre-internet times? Do people have more or fewer relationships? Do they have more or less contact with friends and relatives?
Does the ability of the internet to connect instantly around the world mean that far-flung ties now predominate over neighborly relations?
There is the associated question of whether the internet is splitting people into two separate worlds: Or is the internet now an integral part of the many ways people relate to friends, relatives, and even neighbors in real life?
Social media primarily tend to enhance relationships, they keep us always connected independently from distances. If you use social media when you are phisically with family or friends, in order to stay in touch with other people, yeah, in this case they hinder relationships. Does online social networking hinder the development of teenagers? Essay - The 21st century has seen the internet transformed into a tool that has made communication easier and more accessible. They discuss the ways that technology can both help and hinder your friendships. "Having access to people on Facebook or Twitter does not mean you are allowed to write whatever you want without consequences," says Kelli. If you have an issue with someone, don't make it public. Kelli advises to -- at the very least -- make it a private.
Can online relationships be meaningful, perhaps even as meaningful as in-person relationships? In other words, do they add to what social scientists now call interpersonal social capital?
Such help could take the form of giving information or emotional support, lending a cup of sugar, or providing long-term health care. It is easy enough to give information on the internet. And while it is impossible to change bedpans online, it is easy to use the internet to arrange for people to visit and help.
However, some scholars dispute his evidence. For example, Claude Fischer argued that the ferment of the s was an unnatural high point of social involvement.
Moreover, if people are not going to churches, the Lions Club, or scouting groups as much, has civic involvement died? Or, are they finding such group activity online, through chat rooms, listservs, and group email?
And is the quality the same when people pray online rather than in churches see Campbell, ? To what extent is the internet associated with a transformation of American society from groups to networks? Yet a variety of evidence suggests that many North Americans no longer are bound up in a single neighborhood, friendship, or kinship group.
Rather, they maneuver in social networks. And instead of a single community that provides a wide spectrum of help, it appears that most relationships are specialized, for example, with parents providing financial aid and friends providing emotional support.
The internet supports both sparsely connected, far-flung networks and densely connected, local groups. The environment of one-to-one ties through email and instant messaging can transform groups into networks because the internet easily supports groups through one-to-many emails, listservs, chatrooms, blogs, and the like.
Yet are such groups single all-encompassing Pleasantvilles, or is it more likely that they are just pieces of complex social networks? Research points to the positive social networking effects of connectivity.
As these questions continue to be debated, research is showing that the internet is not destroying relationships or causing people to be anti-social.
The time that most people spend online reduces the time they spend on the relatively unsocial activities of watching TV and sleeping.i Abstract Social networking is a current phenomenon that consists of both web-based communication with Internet users through websites and interaction with others via cellular phones.
Jun 16, · It gets even better when you look at those using social networks, who reported close friends on average. The study even looked into the number of social ties internet users and non-internet users have, and found that online Americans tend to have ties on average, compared with an offline average of around Beyond social media's role in dating, we can now stay in touch with old friends through sites like Facebook, keeping updated on who's getting engaged, having children, etc.
From text messaging, Skype, webcams, Facebook, Twitter and emails, the facilitation of communication has never been more available. However, there are times when the one-on-one communication between human beings falls through the cracks and technology can take control over a family.
The problem with online friendship is that when things go wrong, we split. When I say something that makes you uncomfortable, or when you offend me, we’ll go our separate ways more often than not.
And this flies in the face of how people actually become friends.
Photo credit: LordKhan (Creative. Friendship is a relationship of mutual affection between people. Friendship is a stronger form of interpersonal bond than an association. Friendship has been studied in academic fields such as communication, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and timberdesignmag.coms academic theories of friendship have been proposed, including social exchange theory, equity theory, relational.