An analysis of the competitive environment of underarmour ua

The shares now appear fairly expensive, however, at least on a price-to-earnings basis. Should individual investors follow their lead and take a pass on UA stock at this time? Or will the explosive growth continue for several more years to come, rendering this a worthwhile entry point? The Business Baltimore, Maryland-based Under Armour, founded in by CEO Kevin Plank and public since latestarted out as a maker of compression t-shirts and gradually evolved into a global designer and distributor of high-performance athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories.

An analysis of the competitive environment of underarmour ua

Share Since its development inthe Porter's Five Forces Model has been a helpful tool used by prospective investors to help analyze the industry in which a certain company operates. UA manufactures and markets cutting-edge clothing, sporting goods and accessories.

UA is a relatively young company, having only gone public in It faces the challenge of competing against long-standing industry giants such as Nike and Adidas.

As such, Under Armour must rely on superior product innovation and unique marketing techniques.

Under armour has a good competitive environment. Competitive advantage should be based on an understanding of industry structures and the way they change. Porter has identified five forces that shape every organization, industry and market. Under Armour Strategic Analysis. Under Armour: Case 1 The following is an environmental analysis of the “performance apparel” business sector of the athletic apparel industry, with an analysis on Under Armour, the 3rd largest athletic apparel company. The company is clearly rapidly growing, touching markets that have been dominated before, but continues to pride themselves on the performance of . Learn about Under Armour and how it differentiates itself in the competitive athletic apparel industry in light of Porter's Five Forces model.

Its product development and marketing techniques prove UA has been on the front line of changing competitive dynamics in its industry. UA's strategic management decisions prove its desire to be the industry leader in product and marketing innovation.

For example, the company has spent substantial money acquiring mobile technology companies such as MyFitnessPal to more effectively engage with athletes and create deeper brand affiliations. Its ability to innovate and provide increased perceived value to its customers is absolutely necessary for future success due to the intense competition it faces.

Competition in the Industry While there are countless numbers of athletic apparel companies that compete with UA in certain market niches, only a few companies have the sheer size and established distribution channels to compete across all the product lines UA offers.

The largest of these competitors are Nike and Adidas.

Under Armour: A Short SWOT Analysis

Both of these competitors are older companies with higher total annual sales than UA. While this disparity is enormous, it must also be noted that UA has achieved a significantly higher growth rate in recent years than either of its giant competitors. Although it does not possess the same diversification of products or the international market penetrationUA has been successful in nearly every industry subsection it has entered.

An analysis of the competitive environment of underarmour ua

Potential of New Entrants In general, the barriers to entry for a diversified athletic apparel company are very high. It takes a significant amount of financial and human capital to develop products, manufacture them with quality and affordability, and push products into the appropriate distribution channels.

As of JanuaryUA is the most recent case study of a significant new entrant into the industry, and it has proven it can be successful. However, achieving the size and market share of a company such as Nike takes years or even decades.

It is highly possible for new companies to enter smaller niches of the industry. For example, a new entrant may find success in marketing an innovative product to one particular sport, such as golf or tennis. UA started by marketing primarily to American football, creating a better base-layer shirt than had been available at the time.

Under Armour, Inc. PESTEL / PEST & Environment Analysis[Strategy]

It is more likely for certain segments of the industry to be susceptible to new competitors than the entire industry, at least in the near term. Power of Suppliers Suppliers in the athletic apparel industry often sell materials to competing companies. Larger buyers obtain cheaper prices from these suppliers by ordering larger quantities than smaller companies.

For example, Nike may be able to buy exponentially more cotton for T-shirts than UA and negotiate a substantially lower price. This may partially explain why UA, in general, tends to have higher-priced products than Nike. But UA has been extremely innovative in the materials it uses by creating various proprietary fabric blends it sources from third parties.

This not only creates product differentiation from the competition, but it also avoids the disadvantage of buying the same materials at a lower volume and higher cost than competitors. Power of Customers Customers certainly have a wide range of choices when it comes to buying clothing and accessories for their favorite sports.

In the world of online shopping, customers also have the ability to quickly and easily shop for the lowest price for a similar product.

Competition in the Industry

With that in mind, it becomes critical for a company such as UA to create products for which customers are willing to pay a premium over mainstream, price-competitive goods. Research shows customers also buy based on brand recognition and association.

This is why companies such as Nike have famously paid huge amounts of money to sponsor athletes; customers perceive value based on associations. With this in mind, UA started spending huge dollars to sign some of the best athletes in the world to represent its brand.Under Armour, Inc.

PESTEL analysis is a strategic tool to analyze the macro environment of the organization. PESTEL stands for - Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental & Legal factors that impact the macro environment of Under Armour, Inc.

Under armour has a good competitive environment. Competitive advantage should be based on an understanding of industry structures and the way they change. Porter has identified five forces that shape every organization, industry and market.

Economic Factors that Impact Under Armour, Inc.

Under Armour (UA) has been one of the best growth stocks this decade. Indeed, the fitness-apparel name has been on a tear over the past five years, appreciating almost tenfold in value, as the bottom line has leaped ahead at an annual rate of about 25%.

Summary of External Analysis After analyzing the threats and opportunities facing Under Armour and the industry, it becomes clear that Under Armour faces a high threat of substitute product, high competitive rivalry, and a pressing need for differentiation.

According to our analysis a competitive rivalry within the industry, bargaining power of customers and threat of new entrants are the three key forces which have potential to disrupt Under Armour’s growth story.

Under Armour: A Short SWOT Analysis Justin Hellman | July 13, Under Armour (UA) has been one of the best growth stocks this decade.

Porter's 5 Forces on Under Armour (UA) | Investopedia